Bank of America v. . Waydell
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of tlio Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 6, -1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the- complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The firm of J. F. Hasty & Sons of Detroit, drew their bill of exchange or draft, dated August 11, 1900, and addressed to the. defendants in their firm name of Way-dell & Co. directing them, sixty days after date, to pay to the order of Ives & Son, the sum of $1,500 value received, and to charge the same to the account of the drawers. Ives & Son were bankers in Detroit. Proof was given, at the trial and a finding made by the court that the draft in question was delivered to the payees for the purpose of collection, although the indorsement was in blank. Ives & Son, the Detroit bankers,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mumford v. NicollCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822
3Cited by21 opinions
- Carson v. Federal Reserve BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Kelso Co. v. . EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Waters v. Byers Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- First State Bank of Bristow v. O'BannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Brown v. BrownCity of New York Municipal Court · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.