Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Anthony National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1897No. 9202PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Harper District Court. Hon. 6?. W. McKay, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

The original action was replevin brought by the Bank against Gardner, who was Sheriff, .and Privett, who. was Deputy Sheriff, to recover 125 head of cattle, 67 head of calves, 97 head of hogs, 19 brood mares, 1 stallion, 2-|- sets of harness and 2 lumber wagons. A trial was had before the Court and .a jury at January term, 1892, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff below.

Prior to February 1, 1889, this property belonged to F. B. & S. S. Singer, who held the same on two large tracts of land four or five miles apart, one being known as the Silver Creek place and the other as the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lyeth v. GriffisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones & Nixon v. First State Bank of HamlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. National Bank v. DuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API