Legal Opinion

National Bank v. Duff

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1908No. 15,200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Brown district court; William I. Stuart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The first question presented for determination is one of fact: What was the usual place of residence of an Indian named M. Spitto at the time service of a summons was attempted? It is not dis*249puted that, for purposes of jurisdiction and the administration of the law, a-man must have a legal residence; that when a place of residence has once been established it will continue until another has been acquired; that to effect a change there must be an intent to abandon, an actual removal, and an intent to make the place to which the party has…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davidson v. WaldronIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  3. Barr v. CannonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Bilby v. HartmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Johnson v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. TiedemannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Ferry v. Hakalau Plantation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API