Ross v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1DissentJudith Rogers, Judge
Because I cannot agree with the majority that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting the blood test report into evidence, I dissent.
In 1985, the General Assembly amended Ark. Stat. Ann. Section 34-705.2 to provide that a written report of the blood test results by a duly qualified expert performing the tests, certified by an affidavit duly subscribed and sworn to by him before a notary public, may be produced in paternity actions without calling the expert as a witness; and, if either party desires to question the expert, the party shall have him subpoenaed within a reasonable…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Henderson v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Thompson v. YountsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Dildine v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Feagin v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Firemen's Insurance Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.