Legal Opinion
In Re Utica Floor Maintenance, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 21, 1982No. 82-CV-814, Bankruptcy No. 82-00049PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, District Judge.
Under the Bankruptcy Code Section 366, 11 U.S.C. § 366, a utility is required to continue providing service to a Title 11 debtor provided the debtor furnishes “adequate assurance of payment” for its post-petition utility bills. 1 The question presented on this appeal is whether the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New York (Marketos, Bkrtcy. J.) erred by permitting the debtor’s pre-petition security deposit to serve as “adequate assurance of payment” so long as that debt- or remains current in its payments for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re FordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Gary GREENBLATT, Trustee, Appellant, v. Levy FORD, Jr., Appellee. in Re Levy FORD, Jr., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Peralta v. VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor. Appeal of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marion Steel Co. v. Ohio Edison Co. (In Re Marion Steel Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
- Professional Sales Corp. v. United States (In Re Professional Sales Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- In Re Caldor, Inc.-NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re Penn Jersey Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Utica Floor Maintenance, Inc. (In Re Utica Floor Maintenance, Inc.)District Court, N.D. New York · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.