Legal Opinion

Cope v. West American Insurance Co. of the Ohio Casualty Group

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1989No. 86-356 CV; CA A45475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, arguing that there were genuine issues of material fact and that summary judgment was therefore improper. We reverse and remand.

In September, 1985, plaintiff drove her automobile to work and parked in her employer’s parking lot, which was across a public street from her employer’s premises. After parking her car, she walked across the lot and had either entered or was about to enter the public sidewalk area when she was struck by an automobile driven by a co-employe, who was also on his way to work. Plaintiff filed a claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Henderson-Rubio v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Montgomery Ward v. CutterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Adamson v. Dalles Cherry Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. MalinenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cope v. West American InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Taal v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Peterson v. Utah Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. Cope v. West American InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API