Legal Opinion

State v. Livas

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 2009No. 35301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZMAN, Judge Pro Tem.

Gilbert Livas appeals from the district court’s appellate decision affirming the magistrate’s order denying his motion to dismiss for a violation of his statutory speedy trial right. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

On September 9, 2006, Livas was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol. Five days later, he pleaded not guilty and demanded that his trial be set within the statutory speedy trial period which would ran on March 14, 2007. A jury trial was scheduled for November 6 and the pre-trial conference was set for October 10.

On October 10, Livas filed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. DeWittIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. YoungIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. DillardIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MooreIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. RobertsColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. Brett J. JacobsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. Albert A. CicconeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API