Legal Opinion

Chavez v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 19, 1995No. 14443PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The employment security board of review (board) moves to intervene in this appeal from the Superior Court’s judgment reversing the board’s decision and remanding the case for de novo proceedings. We conclude that the board has the right to intervene in this appeal pursuant to General Statutes § 31-249c, and, therefore, we grant the board’s motion to intervene.

*442The plaintiff, upon leaving her employment as a mental retardation worker at the Southbury Training School, applied to the administrator of unemployment compensation and was granted benefits pursuant to General Statutes § 31-241. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MattioliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Enquist v. General DatacomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bridgeport Firefighters Ass'n, IAFF, Local 834 v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API