Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

Delaware Family Court

Decided September 15, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the court for decision are the prayers of the parties for ancillary relief. 1 Both parties are seeking division and allocation of marital property. Wife is also seeking alimony, counsel fees and costs. There are several large issues:(1) How to value husband’s dental practice;(2) How to value husband’s profit sharing and pension plan;(3) Whether the $26,000 received by husband from his parents was a gift or a loan; and(4) Whether wife is entitled to “reimbursement alimony”.

Husband is now seeking a 50-50 division of marital assets. He argues that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stern v. SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Mahoney v. MahoneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. R. T. G. v. G. K. G.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  5. Walter W.B. v. Elizabeth P.B.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of WeinsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Archer v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Abrams v. AbramsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Guy v. GuyMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Prahinski v. PrahinskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API