Johnson v. Mortham
District Court, N.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
*1120 ORDER
BY THE COURT:
Pending are the Plaintiffs’ motions and amended motion for attorney fees and costs against Defendants Florida Secretary of State Sandra Mortham, the Florida Senate, and the Florida House of Representatives (collectively, the “State Defendants”) (docs. 201, 213, 216 & 250), and the Plaintiffs’ motion to tax expert witness fees against the United States (doc. 205).
I. Background
Plaintiffs are white and hispanic voters who raised an equal protection challenge to Florida’s Third Congressional District under the authority of Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630, 113 S.Ct. 2816, 125 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Baker v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- Green v. MorthamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1997
- Moore v. University of Notre DameDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Bandera v. City of QuincyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.