Legal Opinion
Heidelberg Americas, Inc. v. Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 20, 2003No. 01-2463PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Circuit Judge.
In July 2001, Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho and TKS (USA), Inc. (collectively, “TKS”), served a subpoena duces tecum on Heidelberg Americas, Inc., and Heidelberg Web Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Heidelberg”). The subpoena sought information purportedly relevant to a lawsuit in which TKS is a party but Heidelberg is not. Heidelberg, which was served at its offices in New Hampshire, successfully moved to quash the subpoena in the resident United States District Court under Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(c)(3). TKS appeals, asserting abuse of discretion. We affirm-.
I. Background
TKS is a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Horizons Titanium Corporation v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Brandt v. Wand PartnersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Remexcel Managerial Consultants, Inc. v. ArlequinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Cabral v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- In Re Subpoena to WitzelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Braga v. HodgsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.