Legal Opinion
In Re Subpoena to Witzel
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 7, 2008No. 07-2286PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DiCLERICO, District Judge.
This appeal arises out of a discovery dispute in litigation pending in the Eastern District of California (“the California district court”). 1 The plaintiff in the California action, California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials (“CAPEEM”), subpoenaed documents from a nonparty, Professor Michael Witzel, and then moved to compel Witzel to comply with its subpoena. CAPEEM’s subpoena sought production of documents in Massachusetts and, therefore, issued from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (“the Massachusetts…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Estate of Bennett v. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Harriman v. Hancock CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Lyman v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Remexcel Managerial Consultants, Inc. v. ArlequinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Curet-Velazquez v. Acemla De Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.