Legal Opinion

Basil v. Pope

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1931No. 23239. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

— At about 6:30 on the afternoon of April 2, 1926, the plaintiff was driving his automobile in an easterly direction on Duryea street, in the city of Raymond, Washington. At the same time, the defendants, Pope and wife, by their minor son, William Pope, were driving their automobile in the same direction, and attempted to drive ahead of the plaintiff, and on so doing, the two cars came into collision and were considerably damaged.

The plaintiff brought an action to recover for the damages to his car, alleging that the accident occurred within a street intersection, and was due to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. City of Rock Island v. StarkeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. HarrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Santoro v. BrooksOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Ballard Transfer & Storage Co. v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ottis v. Stevenson-Carson School District No. 303Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. Pacific County v. Sherwood Pacific, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. State v. CooneyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. BoikoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. BoikoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API