Legal Opinion
Cole v. DeBobula
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 1944No. 198PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
Appellee, plaintiff below, sued for the contract price of his services as architect. The case was tried by the court without a jury and judgment entered for plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.
November 22, 1943, plaintiff submitted to defendants a written proposal for bis employment “as architect in preparing pians and specifications of the contemplated alterations and additional construction” of a building under lease to defendants, operated by them as a rooming house. After acknowledging a payment of $100 and providing for the payment of an additional $150, his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Green v. ObergfellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. First Nat. Bank of BurlingameCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Sipley v. StickneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arsenault v. AngleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Sterling v. MarshallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947