Legal Opinion
Seatoma Convalescent Center v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 12, 1996No. Nos. 17822-2-II; 17668-8-II; 17871-1-IIPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Houghton, A.C.J.
In a consolidated appeal of three cases involving numerous nursing facilities,1 Seatoma and KLR challenge the Department of Social and Health Services’ (DSHS) administrative determination of their Medicaid reimbursement rates in the nursing services and administration and operations cost centers. They argue that DSHS was required to reimburse the facilities for all of the necessary and ordinary expenses that were not expressly unallowable. DSHS cross-appeals the trial court’s rulings in KLR and Branch Villa that DSHS must adopt an additional method to determine the cost…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- COBRA ROOFING SERVICE, INC. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Cobra Roofing Service, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Alpine Lakes Protection Society v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Seatoma Convalescent Center v. DSHSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Roller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.