Legal Opinion
Tri-State Consumer Insurance v. Yaskin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 7, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend or indemnify the defendant Igor Yaskin in any action arising out of an automobile accident which occurred on December 7, 1998, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated May 7, 2002, which, after a nonjury trial, declared that it is obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant Igor Yaskin against any and all claims arising out of the incident.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant Igor Yaskin was involved in an automobile accident…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Argentina v. Otsego Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Tri-State Consumer Insurance v. DabushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Arch-Bilt Container Corp. v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Abbey Richmond Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bauerschmidt & Sons, Inc. v. Nova Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Liciaga v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024