Inmates of the Allegheny County Jail v. Wecht
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHILL, Chief Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Presently before the Court are (1) plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions, (2) defendants’ Motion to Increase Population Cap at the Allegheny County Jail, and (3) third-party defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. The recurring issue permeating this case is whether the inmates in the custody of defendant County of Allegheny, et al., (“County”) are being housed under constitutionally adequate conditions. For the reasons set forth below, we will grant plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions, conditionally grant defendant’s Motion to Increase…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kost v. KozakiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Kost v. KozakiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Tillery v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Tillery v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Inmates of the Allegheny County Jail v. WechtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.