Legal Opinion
People v. Ingram
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 9, 1999PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment *960unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Ontario County Court for resentencing in accordance with the following Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw the guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review her challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). Contrary to the contention of defendant, the plea allocution does not qualify for the rare case exception to the preservation doctrine; her statements did not engender significant doubt with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. ToxeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. MohammedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. LernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. StokesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. OttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. ShandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. SinklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.