Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley
California Supreme Court
1Concurrence
LIU, J.,
Concurring. — I agree with today’s opinion that “a finding of environmental impacts must be based on the proposed project as actually approved and may not be based on unapproved activities that opponents assert will be necessary because the project, as approved, cannot be built.” (Maj. opn., ante, at p. 1119.) This rule will not lead to evasion of the environmental review requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) because presumably a *1123developer’s failure to build the project as approved will be remedied by the local agency…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Friends Of" B" Street v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Ass'n for Protection of Environmental Values v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.