Legal Opinion
Murray v. Administration for Children's Services
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 12, 2007No. 05 Civ. 0359(RJH)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOLWELL, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Dyandria Murray brings this action against the New York City Administration for Children’s Services (“ACS”), the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”), ACS caseworker Lucile Blunt, NYPD Detective Angelo Paecione, foster care agency Forestdale, Inc., Forestdale employee Pascal Jean-Noel, and various unnamed defendants. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law, plaintiff seeks damages and equitable remedies for false arrest and imprisonment, malicious prosecution, and interference with parental rights. The City defendants…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bryant v. CiminelliDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- Nielsen v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Ernst v. KauffmanDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2014
- Murray v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Abram v. Town of Cheektowaga Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.