Legal Opinion
Brownstone Publishers, Inc. v. New York City Department of Finance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 9, 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Governor’s Advisory Commn., 71 NY2d 964).
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- New York Pub. Interest Research Group, Inc. v. Governor's Advisory Comm'n to Make Findings & Recommendations About Problems Relating to Liab. Ins.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Sharma v. Skaarup Ship Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Matter of Continental Airlines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Merlite Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Valassis Inserts, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.