Legal Opinion

Sohigro Service Co. v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 19, 1988No. 3—87—0761WCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvo

Claimant, Roger Marvin Brasel, sought compensation under the Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.) alleging that he sustained injuries arising out of and during the course of his employment with Sohigro Service Company (Sohigro). The arbitrator, Angelo Caliendo, found that claimant did not sustain injuries arising out of and during the course of his employment and thus denied compensation. The Industrial Commission (the Commission) reversed the arbitrator’s decision and awarded claimant compensation for temporary total disability of 985h weeks,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berry v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Illinois Valley Irrigation, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Fleming v. FlemingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Ristow v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Taylor v. Checker Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovejoy Electronics, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Gerald N. O'berto, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Coleman v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Luis Plata v. Eureka Locker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API