Legal Opinion

New Jersey Franklinite Co. v. Ames

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This cause coming on to he hoard, a motion was made to join, as defendants to the suit, certain new parties. The grounds of the application appear in the opinion be-low.

1Opinion of the Court

*508The opinion of the Court on this motion was delivered by

G-eeen, O. J.

The respondent filed his bill in equity for the foreclosure of a mortgage given by the New Jersey Franklinite Company to the complainant below. After the execution of the mortgage to Ames, the company executed a second mortgage to certain persons, as trustees, to secure the payment of bonds thereafter to be issued by the corporation. The trustees are parties defendants in the suit. A decree was made in the Court of Chancery, in favor of the complainant, for the foreclosure of the mortgage and sale of the mortgaged premises.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schuster v. Ventnor Gardens, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  2. Heward v. HydeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API