Legal Opinion

Schuster v. Ventnor Gardens, Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 5, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The above cause is one for the foreclosure of a mortgage, and in it Mr. Max Grossman was appointed receiver for the defendant corporation. Application was made to a vice-chancellor for leave to make the receiver a party defendant in a certain suit in the court of chancery between John O. Wilson, complainant, and Ventnor Gardens, Incorporated, and others, defendants, and the purpose of which suit is to foreclose a mortgage given by one Sullivan covering premises, the legal title to which is the Ventnor Gardens Company, Incorporated. Before an application was made to the vice-chancellor, an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. W.D. Cashin Co. v. Alamac Hotel Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  2. Davis v. FlaggSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1882
  3. Bull v. International Power Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
  4. Black v. Delaware & Raritan Canal Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1873
  5. Ashby v. YetterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ditmars v. Camden Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  2. Perfection Garment Co. v. Crosby Stores, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. Fernow v. Liberty Royalties Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API