Legal Opinion
De Cremer v. Anderson
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error to Marquette; Stone, J. Assumpsit by Elorian De Cremer against William F. Anderson and Abraham Boulsom upon an alleged contract of guaranty. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Julius Jacobson desired to buy goods of the plaintiff. The plaintiff sent him a blank paper reading as follows:
“For the purpose of enabling Julius Jacobson to purchase goods upon credit from F. De Cremer, of Green Bay, Wis., we hereby guarantee that said Julius Jacobson shall promptly pay him for all goods which he may hereafter sell to him upon credit, until this guaranty is revoked; said payment to be made within 10 days after receiving goods. Our liability hereunder shall cover any balance to become due, not exceeding $300.”
This was afterwards dated May 2, 1894, and signed by defendants.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Craft v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
- Roberts v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. KerchevalMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Winnebago Paper Mills v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by9 opinions
- Buhrer v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Miami County National Bank v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- German Savings Bank v. Drake Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Lester Piano Co. v. RomneyUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Detroit Free Press v. PattengillMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.