Legal Opinion

Schwaner v. George

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1947No. 574PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Viola George sued Chas. Garner for possession of certain dwelling property and thereafter obtained leave of court to amend the name of the defendant to read “Frank Schwaner.” Mary Schwaner moved to intervene in the cause and her motion was granted. Thereupon the intervenor moved to quash service on defendant and this motion was granted. Other motions were made by the intervenor but. before action was taken on them plaintiff, with approval of the court, took a voluntary nonsuit. Upon entry of nonsuit judgment was ordered for the defendant for recovery of his costs.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Electrotype Co. v. KerschbaumCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Klein v. LissDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Korr v. ButzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Adams v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. O'DonnellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API