Legal Opinion
Phany Poeng v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 18, 2001No. 3:01-cv-01338PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR STAY OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
WHELAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Phany Poeng (“Plaintiff’) moves to stay the Food and Nutrition Service’s (“FNS”) administrative proceedings pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 2023(a)(17) and 7 C.F.R. § 279.10(d). Defendant United States of America (“Defendant”) opposes. All parties are represented by counsel. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d.l).
I. Background
Plaintiff is the sole proprietor and owner of a retail food store known as 97 Supermarket. Since March…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walczak v. EPL Prolong, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Kim v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In the Matter of Farouk Ibrahim, D/B/A Onondaga Circle Market v. United States of America, Acting Through the Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Plaid Pantry Stores, Inc., Dba Plaid Pantry Store No. 65 v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dinner Bell Markets, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
- Morgan v. RaganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Tony's Pantry Mart Inc. 1 v. United States of America Department of Agriculture Food & Nutrition ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Affum v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- FAISAL & A, LLC v. United States of America, United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.