Legal Opinion

State v. Mather

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 13, 1969No. 470, September Term, 1968PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, C.J.,

delivered the majority opinion of the Court. Orth, J., concurs. Concurring opinion by Orth, J., at page 555 infra.

The question here to be decided is whether the State has the right to appeal to this court from the granting of the defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence alleged by him to have been obtained as a result of an unlawful search and seizure.

Appellee Mather was charged in Prince George’s County with unlawfully having caused the termination of a human pregnancy in violation of Chapter 470 of the Acts of 1968, now codified as Sections 149E-149G of Article 43 of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821
  2. State v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  3. State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. State v. BargerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Pearlman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lohss and Sprenkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. State v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Raimondi v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. State v. SiegelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. State v. CampbellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API