Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Department of Transportation

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1999No. Docket No. 205165PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right the order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(4) and the order denying his motion to amend his complaint in this negligence action against the Department of Transportation. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff filed this action against the Department of Transportation in the Court of Claims under the defective highway exception to governmental immunity.1 The Court of Claims dismissed the action on the ground that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because plaintiff failed to file a verified complaint as required by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lisee v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. VenticinqueMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hussey v. City of Muskegon HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Hanger v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas v. Donna Loutzenhiser, as Next Friend of Stephen Luke Loutzenhiser, a MinorTexas Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API