Legal Opinion

Dempsey v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided February 29, 1984No. 09-83-043-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Clarence Dempsey appeals from conviction for possession of a controlled substance (Pentazocine), with intent to deliver, in an amount less than two hundred (200) grams. The Court assessed punishment at six years confinement.

Appellant asserts five grounds of error. The first four grounds of error challenge the sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction and to prove intent of appellant; also challenge is made to sufficiency of evidence to prove possession and to negate an hypothesis concerning possible guilt of another person other than appellant.

Detective Ray E.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Autry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Culmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Stogsdill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGuill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  2. Jeffery P. Joas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  3. Jeffery P. Joas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  4. Jeffery P. Joas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API