Legal Opinion

Rubel v. Allegretti Chocolate Cream Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 31, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Bill for Injunction, to restrain the use of a trade-name. Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Nathaniel C. Sears, Judge, presiding. Hearing and decree for complainant. Appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Horton

The contest in this case arises as to the use, and the right to the use, of the name “ Allegretti ” in connection with the manufacture and sale of chocolate cream candy. Ho point or suggestion is made in the briefs or arguments of counsel as to the phraseology of the restraining decree quoted. The case is presented upon the broad question that appellants have a right, as against appellee, to use the firm name “ Allegretti & Co.” in just the manner they have been and are using it.

Appellants contend that appellee can not maintain its bill of complaint filed in this case, because (1) no right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Russia Cement Co. v. LePageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Williams v. FarrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Fish Bros. Wagon v. La Belle Wagon WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Merry v. . HoopesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John R. Thompson Co., Doing Business as and Through Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Holloway House, Inc. v. Mrs. Lee Holloway, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Allegretti Chocolate Cream Co. v. RubelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  3. Allegretti Chocolate Cream Co. v. RubelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  4. Allegretti Chocolate Cream Co. v. RubelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Allegretti v. Allegretti Chocolate Cream Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API