Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 22, 1996No. 7, 1995PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

Defendant below-appellant, Sammie Richardson, Jr. (“Richardson”), appeals from sentences based on convictions in Superior Court after a jury trial on charges of second degree robbery, second degree kidnapping, first degree assault and resisting arrest. He raises two issues in this appeal. First, he argues that the Superior Court erred when it allowed the jury to consider two alternative means to find that Richardson possessed the purpose to commit kidnapping in the second degree. Second, he argues that the victim’s pre-trial identification of him was unreliable because…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  3. Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  4. McDade v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  5. Disabatino v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API