Legal Opinion

H.B. ex rel. Clarke v. Whittemore

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 11, 1995No. C0-91-2115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant parents and their children challenge summary judgment on their negligence and fraud claims, arguing that respondents’ failure to warn them of a dangerous resident resulted in the sexual abuse of the children. We affirm summary judgment on the fraud claim, but reverse and remand for trial on the negligence claim.

FACTS

Appellants Tracy Clarke, David Tietze, and Pamela Tietze are parents who brought this action on behalf of their four minor children who were sexually abused by respondent Willard Whittemore. Appellants and Whittemore lived in the Eaton Mobile Home…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Cairl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. M.H. v. Caritas Family ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HB by and Through Clark v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. HB BY AND THROUGH CLARKE v. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. HB by and Through Clark v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API