Legal Opinion
United States of America Ex Rel. Jeffrey E. Main v. Oakland City University
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 20, 2005No. 05-2016PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Many federal subsidies under the Higher Education Act require multiple layers of paperwork. First the college or university submits an application to establish the institution’s eligibility. If this application, which we call phase one, is granted, the institution and its students submit additional (“phase two”) applications for specific grants, loans, or scholarships. Both a statute, 20 U.S.C. § 1094, and a regulation, 34 C.F.R. § 668.14(b)(22)(i), condition institutional eligibility on a commitment to refrain from paying recruiters contingent fees for enrolling…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Eric Steven Bower v. E. Michael Jones, Ruth Jones, and Ultramontane Associates, Incorporated, an Indiana Not-For-Profit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States Ex Rel. Allen Lamers v. City of Green BayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Richard M. Perlman and Perlman Marketplace Investors v. Samuel ZellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States Ex Rel. Graves v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Berkowitz v. Automation Aids, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Mary Hendow Julie Albertson v. University of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States Ex Rel. Grenadyor v. Ukrainian Village Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Yannacopoulos v. General DynamicsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Reeves v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.