Frey v. Amoco Production Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT F. COLLINS, District Judge.
Before the Court are cross-motions for partial summary judgment filed by plaintiffs and defendant in the above-styled case. Plaintiffs, Frederick J. Frey, et al., contend that there are no material issues of disputed fact and that take-or-pay payments made to defendant, Amoco Production Company (“Amoco”), by Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (“Columbia”) are subject to the royalty provisions of plaintiffs’ lease agreement with the defendant. The defendant, Amoco, contends that there are no material facts in dispute and that plaintiffs are not entitled to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Prince Heyward v. Public Housing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Steele v. DenningSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Diamond Shamrock Exploration Co. v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior and William C. Bettenberg, Director, Etc., Cities Service Oil and Gas Corporation v. Donald P. Hodel, Mesa Petroleum Company v. U.S. Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Steele v. DenningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Succession of RuggLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frey v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Harvey E. Yates Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Hurd Enterprises, Ltd. v. Bruni, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
- Klein v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Frederick J. Frey v. Amoco Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.