Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Ideal Cement

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1991No. 72859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice:

Petitioner, Tom A. Mitchell (Mitchell) filed a claim against respondents, Ideal Cement and its insurance carrier, the State Insurance Fund (hereafter collectively Ideal) for work-related injury to his lungs and upper respiratory system purportedly caused by 13 years continuous exposure to various forms of dust and fumes in the workplace. At trial Mitchell introduced the deposition, with attached medical report, of Dr. G.C., who opined Mitchell has an impairment of 25% to the body as a whole secondary to a class 2 respiratory impairment and damage to his lungs as a result of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Richardson v. M. & D. Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Collins v. Halliburton ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fiore v. Consolidated FreightwaysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Carney v. TCI Cablevision of TulsaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API