Wagner & Brown v. Anr Pipeline Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge:
Wagner & Brown appeals the district court’s dismissal of its action for damages for breach of a take-or-pay clause in a natural gas purchase contract. The district court did not abuse its discretion by deferring to the primary jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a determination of whether such take-or-pay issues affected the maximum lawful price of natural gas. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. However, to avoid possible prejudice to Wagner & Brown’s rights under the contract, we direct the district court to modify its order dismissing…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Meyer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pennzoil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. WeickerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Austin Lakes Joint Venture v. Avon Utilities, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1995
- The Chlorine Institute, Inc. v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
- At&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of Austin, Tex.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.