Legal Opinion

Wagner & Brown v. Anr Pipeline Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1988No. 87-2500PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge:

Wagner & Brown appeals the district court’s dismissal of its action for damages for breach of a take-or-pay clause in a natural gas purchase contract. The district court did not abuse its discretion by deferring to the primary jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a determination of whether such take-or-pay issues affected the maximum lawful price of natural gas. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. However, to avoid possible prejudice to Wagner & Brown’s rights under the contract, we direct the district court to modify its order dismissing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Meyer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Pennzoil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. WeickerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Austin Lakes Joint Venture v. Avon Utilities, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. The Chlorine Institute, Inc. v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
  5. At&T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. City of Austin, Tex.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API