Leograndis v. Liquor Control Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The named plaintiff, hereafter referred to as the plaintiff, operated an establishment known as Cosmo’s Hide-Away, Inc., in Southington under a restaurant liquor permit issued by the defendant. Following a hearing held on July 25,1960, the defendant suspended the plaintiff’s permit for thirty days on the ground that the premises were unsuitable by reason of the fact that they were not *509a restaurant within the meaning of the Liquor Control Act (General Statutes, c. 545), “in that the establishment is not kept, used, maintained, advertised and held out to the public to be a place where hot meals…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Guillara v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Cohn v. Mt. Zion Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Neubauer v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Chariott v. McMullenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Waldrop v. BurgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972