Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Fischer

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 2, 2005No. 04-0756/MCPublished

1Dissent

ERDMANN, Judge, with whom GIERKE, Chief Judge, joins

(dissenting):

The majority opinion finds that terminating the pay of a servicemember in pretrial confinement, whose term of service has been involuntarily extended by the Government, does not constitute illegal pretrial punishment under Article 13, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 813 (2000). I would hold that the regulation requiring the termination of pay under those circumstances is punitive in effect and its application constitutes illegal pretrial punishment.

Fischer was placed in pretrial confinement on May 4, 2001.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. PalmiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API