Legal Opinion
Jung Quey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1915No. 2527PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Tn Error to the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California; M. T. Dooling, Judge. Jung Ouey, alias Sam Kee, and others, were convicted of conspiring to import opium contrary to law, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
Section 37 of the Criminal Code of the United States, as amended (Act March 4, 1909, c. 321, 35 Stat. 1096 [Comp. St. 1913, § 10201]), declares:
“If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such parties do any act to effect the object of the *768conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars, or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”
By its act of January 17, 1914, entitled “An act to amend…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Andrews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Saunders v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. GordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Minner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Short v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Lisansky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. William Rose and Robert PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Chew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.