Legal Opinion

Ritt v. Dingle

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 8, 2001No. 00-2023 ADM/RLEPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MONTGOMERY, District Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

On August 25, 2000, Kelly Jean Ritt (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. No. 1] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter is now before the Court on Petitioner’s Objections [Doc. No. 11] to the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson [Doc. No. 10]. In the R & R, Judge Erickson recommends that the Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. No. 8] be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the R & R is adopted and the Petition for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API