Legal Opinion

Connolly v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1945No. 10890PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

The lower court erred in imposing the statutory penalty. This will clearly appear from a detailed review of the record.

The complaint, filed in the District Court of the United States in and for the District of Montana, Great Falls Division, against Daniel and Brian Connolly, two members of the Blackfeet Indian Tribe, charged the defendant appellants with driving and herding cattle and horses on premises of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation particularly described therein for which they did not have a grazing permit. The Blackfeet Indian Reservation was established by…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Bernard Damsky, Olga Damsky and Henry Birns v. Honorable Joseph C. Zavatt, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. State v. Credit Bureau of Laredo, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Illinois Citizens Committee for Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. FraserDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API