Legal Opinion

Creative Computing, Dba Internet truckstop.com v. getloaded.com Llc, And/or Codified Corporation, and Jack C. Martin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 15, 2004No. 02-35856PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:

This case requires us to construe damages provisions in the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. 1

Facts

Truck drivers and trucking companies try to avoid dead heading. “Deadheading” means having to drive a truck, ordinarily on a return trip, without a revenue-producing load. If the truck is moving, truck drivers and their companies want it to be carrying revenue-producing freight. In the past, truckers and shippers used black boards to match up trips and loads. Eventually television screens were used instead of blackboards, but the matching was still inefficient. Better…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc., and Nme Hospitals, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Julie Chalmers v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. In Re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. A v. Ex Rel. Vanderhye v. Iparadigms, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  2. In re iPhone Application Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  4. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Wirum v. Warren (In Re Warren)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API