Legal Opinion

State v. Sarlls

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1893No. 16,910PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From tbe Posey Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.

On the 29th day of November, 1892, the grand jury of Posey county returned into court an indictment charging the appellee, Roy Sarlls, with the embezzlement of $31 of the funds of William Ford and Braddock McGregor.

Appellee moved the court, orally, to quash the indictment, alleging, for cause, that said indictment, on its face, charged the defendant with embezzlement under section 1945, R. S. 1881; that said indictment contained no allegation that reasonable demand had been made of the appellee, by his client or employer, or persons designated by them to receive the same.

The appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCool v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. State v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Selby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Dean v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. The PEOPLE v. RigginsIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Ocean Accident & Guaranty Corporation v. RubinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API