Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Urstadt

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Courtney McGroarty, J.

In this article 78 proceeding, the petitioners, former members of the board of directors of Trump Village, Section III, Inc., seek an order or judgment determining that the action of1 the respondent in removing and replacing *541said board of directors, is unconstitutional, illegal, arbitrary and capricious, and that any action taken or to be taken by the newly appointed board be adjudged a nullity.

Trump Village is a Mitchell-Lama mutual housing company organized and existing pursuant to the provisions of article 12 of the Public Housing Law, now article 2 of the Private Housing Finance Law.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of TimmisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Lord v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. People Ex Rel. Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art v. GassNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cadplaz Sponsors, Inc. v. Cadman Towers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API