Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Borough of Blawnox

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 2000No. 3434 C.D. 1998PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue presented is whether the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) erred in granting the motions for summary judgment filed by the Boroughs of Blawnox and Oakmont (collectively, Appellees) holding that Ap-pellees are entitled to immunity pursuant to Section 8541 of what is commonly called the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act (Act), 42 Pa.C.S. § 8541. We hold that Appellees are not immune from liability as a matter of law where Joshua D. Aiken (Appellant) alleges that Appellees’ police officers negligently maintained a high-speed vehicular…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crowell v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Powell v. DrumhellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Dickens v. HornerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Jones v. ChieffoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Dickens v. Upper Chichester TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robbins v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Sellers, C, Aplts v. Twp. of Abington,et alSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. McCarthy v. City of BethlehemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Regester v. County of ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Sellers v. Township of AbingtonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API