Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Tucker

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1980No. 4307Published

1ConcurrenceWood, Chief Judge

(specially concurring).

I join in the result reached by the majority, however, I disagree with their reasoning.

Because liability under the Tort Claims Act is based upon traditional tort concepts of duty and because (at the present stage of this case) we must consider that the Highway Department is liable under § 30-8-13(B), N.M.S.A.1978, the majority hold that the waiver of immunity in the maintenance of highways includes a waiver of immunity in the maintenance of fences. This reasoning disregards the plain wording of § 41-4-4(A), N.M.S.A.1978 (1979 Cum.Supp.); there is immunity except as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bettini v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of Albuquerque v. ReddingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API