Legal Opinion

Trend Mills v. Socher

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 21, 1980No. Civ. 74-1210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIUNNO, District Judge.

Trend Mills sued Socher by complaint filed in this court on August 8, 1974. The claim was for merchandise sold and delivered to Soc-Per Holding Corporation, Inc., d/b/a Carpet Warehouse, payment for which had been guaranteed by Socher.

After summons was served and no answer filed, a request for default was filed October 7, 1974, and on proof by affidavit judgment by default was entered October 9, 1974 in the amount of $38,312.90 for liquidated damages and interest, plus costs taxed at $50.

A writ of execution was issued November 7, 1974 and recorded in Book Q of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ward v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Bayard v. LombardSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Elsasser v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  4. Glenny Williams v. Ocean Transport Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. In Re FornabaiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Riverside Investment Partnership, Bankrupt. Appeal of United States of America. In the Matter of Riverside Investment Partnership, Bankrupt. Appeal of Pierce H. Bitker and James E. Shapiro, Co-Trustees of Riverside Investment PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Clifton v. Tavares (In Re Clifton)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
  3. Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
  4. In re Riverside Investment PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API