Legal Opinion

United States v. All Right, Title & Interest in Property & Premises

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 13, 1990No. 88 Civ. 7509PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.

The United States of America (the “government”) commenced this civil in rem forfeiture action on October 21, 1988 by filing a verified complaint against the premises and real property located at 710 Main Street, Peekskill, New York (the “property”). On that same date, the United States Marshal seized the property pursuant to a seizure warrant issued by United States District Court Judge Robert W. Sweet. Jesse James Bunch filed the only claim to the property in opposition to this forfeiture action.

The government’s complaint alleges that the property was…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1973 Rolls RoyceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. All Right, Title & Interest in Property & Premises Known as 710 Main Street, Peekskill, New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. United States v. One 1973 Rolls Royce, V.I.N. SRH-16266 Ex Rel. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Forfeiture, Stop Six CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
  5. United States v. One Parcel of Real EstateDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API