Princeton Restoration Corp. v. International Fidelity Insurance
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Steven M. Gold, Magistrate Judge, dated September 1, 2004, to which no objections have been filed, is adopted in its entirety. For the reasons so clearly and persuasively set forth by Judge Gold, plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is granted, plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment is denied, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment is also denied.
SO ORDERED.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GOLD, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Princeton Restoration Corporation (“Princeton”)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 282 Mountainview Drive LLC v. Norguard Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Allstate Insurance Company v. WeinerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. NICE Global LLC and Nearshore Inbound Call Experts LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026